Two score and zero years ago, our forefathers
witnessed a revolution in not only music but popular culture. Or if you
rather… It was 40 years ago today… Yes, this month marks the fortieth anniversary
of the kick off of Beatlemania in the U.S.
The Beatles were so much more than a pop
group; their music transcended the world of music and became a phenomenon.
They brought youth culture to the forefront, where it has remained ever
since. They took rock and roll from the bastardization of rhythm and blues,
bastardized some of that but also added something wholly new and created
a new path that would set rock n roll into an entirely different direction;
eventually many directions. (remember Ozzy among others claim the Beatles
as their biggest influence)
When you look back at their body of work,
it really is amazing when you consider how many different musical landscapes
they ventured over and brought under the umbrella of rock n roll or rather
its offspring “rock”. Pop standards (When I’m 64), Ragtime (Martha
My Dear), Folk Americana (Rocky Raccoon), Eastern music (too many to list).
In fact, the list can go on and on. In six short years, the four lads from
Liverpool laid down a body of work that has been unparalleled ever since.
And their phenomenon has never been matched. It was a matter of timing,
striking a chord that needed to be struck, talent, musical vision, trailblazing
and so much more. But it really was all a happy accident. It would be nice
to point to some smart record executives or music journalist and say, there
was someone who had foresight and saw greatness in the working class boys
from the North of England. But it wasn’t that way at all. In reality, it
was pretty much the opposite. And the funny thing is, when you look
at some of the most popular bands in rock history, most of them share that
in common. They owe their fame not to “brilliant” record executives, but
instead to luck that allowed them to break through DESPITE what those “brilliant”
record executives did or did not do to make it happen.
In the last official antiTorial we looked
a little at artist development. This time we are going to take a look at
three of the most popular groups in rock history that actually became legends
by accident, not by conventional wisdom or brilliant strategies of their
record companies. Of course, the main focus will be on those lads from
Liverpool and that revolution they sparked in February of 1964, and how
the record companies stood in the way of making that happen. But first
we start with a couple of tales of chance for two other later artists that
went on to become immensely popular and how good fortune gets far more
credit than marketing strategy or record company visionaries.
Running on Dumb Luck.
Michael Jackson has been denied the honor
of having the best selling album in U.S. history simply because a secretary
thought a musician was cute. It’s a rarely discussed fact that over 100
million albums were sold because that secretary spotted a glossy in a garbage
can along with a demo tape and decided to take it to her boss because she
thought the musician in the picture was cute. True story.
A young singer songwriter sent an unsolicited
tape and 8x10 to the offices of an upstart music label called Asylum that
had been started by a former William Morris Agency mailroom clerk turned
music agent extraordinaire by the name of David Geffen.
An A&R rep tossed the tape and photo
in the garbage. A secretary discovered the photo and thought that the singer
was cute so she grabbed the photo and tape. She was so moved by the song
on the tape, she insisted that Geffen give the song a listen. Geffen was
impressed enough with this unknown musician named Jackson Browne that he
paid him a visit.
While he was discussing the prospects of
a recording contract with the young singer- songwriter, at Browne’s Echo
Park home, Browne told Geffen that he should also check out the band that
lived upstairs. That band was then going by the name “The Longbranch Penny
Whistle”, Geffen met with the group and decided to give them a shot as
well. They would change their name to “The Eagles” before their first album
hit the stores. So from a secretary picking up a photo that a supposed
expert A&R person cast aside and a casual conversation with an unknown
musician that followed, the band that would go on to have the biggest selling
album in U.S history was discovered.
All told the Eagles have sold over 88 million
albums in the U.S., 28 million for their all time best selling “Their Greatest
Hits 1971 – 1975”. Jackson Browne didn’t do too badly either,
he has racked up sales of over 16.5 million in the U.S., 7 million for
his career defining album “Running on Empty.” None of which
would have happened if Browne had been ugly, or if Geffen wasn’t a man
to take chances on new things. But it all started with dumb luck, not some
brilliant A&R person walking into a club or listening to a demo and
spotting the next big thing.
You CAN Go Your Own Way.
“Blues band becomes international pop sensation.”
That was exactly what happened to Fleetwood Mac, the band started by Blues
great Peter Green and named after his favorite rhythm section, Mick Fleetwood
and John McVie.
“Peter Green is better than God” read a
piece of graffiti on a London wall. The inscription was written beneath
the proclamation “Clapton is God”. In fact, Peter Green began to
turn heads when he filled Clapton’s shows in Bluesbreakers, John Mayall’s
group that proved to be the finishing school for English blues-rock greats.
After leaving Bluesbreakers over artistic
differences, Green started his own group with Fleetwood and McVie (McVie
joined reluctantly). From there, Peter Green’s Fleetwood Mac began to make
a name for themselves on the British blues scene. Over the next 8
years the group would go through quite a few transformations, not only
in line-ups but in musical style. They have a rather colorful history;
Peter Green quit the band and became a grave digger. One of their guitarists
disappeared hours before a concert in Los Angeles and it turned out that
he had been recruited by a cult on the streets of Hollywood.
Through all the lineup and musical changes,
Fleetwood Mac managed to maintain a small but steady fanbase. Mick Fleetwood
says that the group’s American record company, Warner Brothers, could always
count on the group to release an album each year and sell in the neighborhood
of 300,000 copies. Fleetwood joked that these albums paid Warner’s
light bill for the year. But then fate stepped in to change Fleetwood Mac’s
fortunes.
Early in 1975, Fleetwood went to a local
Los Angeles recording studio to see if it would fit the group’s needs when
it came time to record their next album. They had just lost their lead
guitarist and frontman--again. While scoping out a studio, a young guitarist
working in the next studio over caught his ear. He later claimed that the
pixie girl recording with guitarist didn’t really register at the time.
He was simply impressed by the guitar track he heard.
One thing led to another and without an
audition the guitarist, Lindsey Buckingham and his musical partner and
then girlfriend Stevie Nicks were asked to join the band. Lindsey
and Stevie had released a debut album together in 1973 under the name “Buckingham-Nicks”,
but it failed to reach an audience, so Polydor dropped the duo in 1974.
The chemistry seemed to spark magic when
the new lineup of Fleetwood Mac played together. Nicks and Buckingham’s
voices joined with veteran blues crooner Christine McVie’s to form the
patented harmonies that would become the hallmark of the Fleetwood Mac
sound and with three key songwriters competing with each other, the group
turned out a remarkable album.
The band knew they had something very special
on their hands when they completed work on their 1975 self-titled album.
They went to Warner Bros and told them that the label should really put
some muscle behind the album, because it could be a big hit. The folks
at Warner’s listened and they indeed thought the album could move more
units, perhaps as many as 450,000! Needless to say the band was discouraged
and to make matters worse, the record company showed just how behind the
group and new album they were when an advertisement appeared in Billboard
for the new album that pictured Stevie’s name under Lindsey and vice-versa.
Critics missed the mark as well; Rolling
Stone called Stevie Nick’s voice “callow” and some critics went as far
as calling Christine McVie the only redeeming member that the group had left.
But despite a less than full board press from the label and hit and miss
reviews, the songs soon caught the attention of radio and the album methodically
started selling after the success of single after single dominated Top
40 radio. The album finally hit number one after spending fifty-six weeks
on the climb. By the time the band released their follow up album, “Fleetwood
Mac” had sold 4 million copies and became Warner Bros. biggest selling
album of all time. That was quite a bit more than the optimistic 450,000
WB had predicted.
After the major success of “Fleetwood Mac”,
the pressure was on; very few outside of the band felt that the next album
would be as successful. Mick wrote in his autobiography that in the middle
of recording, he predicted that the new album would sell double the amount
of “Fleetwood Mac”. He was wrong, the follow up album, “Rumours”, has sold
19 million copies to date in the States. Not bad for a band that
just a couple of years previous could hardly get someone from their record
label on the phone.
Who Would Buy That Rubbish?
Now we come to the biggest piece of shortsightedness
ever perpetrated by the major record companies in the history of popular
music; the story of the rise of The Beatles.
Let’s peer back in our time machine looking
glass to America in 1963. The “Twist” was all the rage and the first boyband
mega stars, The Beach Boys, were topping the charts with songs about surfing,
fast cars and sunshine. American was engulfed in the last moments of Camelot,
the moon was a dream worth attaining, no one had heard of Vietnam and the
future looked bright (unless you happened to be a minority).
Meanwhile, a short time earlier, across
the Atlantic a young record store operator by the name of Brian Epstein
walked into a “cellarfull of noise” and was transfixed by what he saw,
a group of long hair (by early 60s standards) rockers captivating the lunch
time audience in the dingy underground Cavern club.
With no experience under his belt, except
operating the largest and most successful record store in the North Country,
he convinced the group that he should be their manager and promised to
get them a record contract in no time.
Epstein felt that with the large amount
of business he did with the British record companies, that is was only
a matter of a phone call to secure the band a record contract. Little did
he know.
He was frustrated at every turn. Phone
calls, letters and personal meetings all ended in the same response, “not
interested.” They wanted the “Twist” and beach music; no one cared
about a British pop band with long hair! “Who would buy that rubbish?”
Luckily one chap at the EMI’s publishing
company liked what he heard and recommended the Beatles to George Martin
who was head of A&R for a small EMI associate label called Parlophone.
George Martin met with Brian Epstein and
agreed to set up a recording audition for the Beatles. When the time came
for the audition, Martin wasn’t overly impressed with the group but he
saw some spark within them. So he offered them a deal to record some singles.
The big problem for him was the group’s drummer Pete Best wasn’t up to
snuff in his opinion. So ol’ Pete had to go and was replaced with Ringo
Star.
The Beatles first single “Love Me Do” was
released on October 4, 1962, but the label didn’t put any promotion behind
it. EMI held fast to their disbelief in the Beatles. When George Martin
announced at a meeting of EMI executives that he was releasing the Beatles,
the stuffed shirts thought he was joking. According to Peter Brown’s biography
of the Beatles, the mood with English record companies at the time was
that guitar groups were a thing of the past and as a result the company
did not get behind “Love Me Do”. It was left up to the group and Brian
Epstein to do the promotion work.
Epstein ordered 10,000 copies of the single
for his record store and spearheaded a letter writing campaign to English
radio stations to encourage them to play the single. The band, their family,
Epstein’s employees and family began sending out letters. The group even
asked fans during live performances to write letters of their own. It worked.
In his book, “The Love You Make”, Peter
Brown wrote, “After hundreds of requests, Radio Luxembourg played it. The
BBC followed with one or two playings and then, like a tiny spark that
at a single moment kindles into flame, ‘Love Me Do’ appeared at forty-nine
on the New Record Mirror charts. When it climbed to number twenty-one on
the Melody Maker charts, the entire northern city of Liverpool was talking
about the Beatles.”
The single eventually landed at number
seventeen and George Martin rushed the group back into the studio to record
a follow up before their momentum faded. They recorded “Please Please Me”
and as they finished recording George Martin announced over the intercom
“Gentleman, you have just recorded your first number one.” Martin was correct
and Beatlemania was born in the UK despite EMI’s lack of support, the band
and their manager made it happen for themselves. “Please Please Me” touched
off a string of number one hits for the group in the U.K. So much for the
record company wisdom when they asked, “Who would buy that rubbish?”
At home the Beatles momentum exploded but
the mainstream press all but ignored them, until they became too big to
ignore. They finally arrived when they were asked to perform for the Queen
at the Royal Command Performance. The next day the Daily Mirror summed
up all the hysteria that the Beatles had created with one simple word “Beatlemania!”
Meanwhile, the major record companies in
America were given the opportunity to take a pass on cashing in on what
would eventually equal sales of 165.5 million albums in the U.S. market.
Oops!
Even EMI’s American record company Capitol
initially took a pass on the group. When “Please Please Me” hit number
one in the UK, George Martin recommended the group to an executive at Capitol.
The executive stupidly responded with a note that said, “They won’t do
anything in this market”. So Brian Epstein decided to shop the band elsewhere.
He managed to get two smaller labels to release the first couple of singles
but without the muscle of a big label behind them, the singles fell flat.
A letter writing campaign might work in the UK but the US is a far larger
market without centralized radio stations.
Epstein knew that the group had to make
some kind of big splash to get the attention of the American record labels.
Luckily for him and the Beatles, America’s leading variety show host got
to see Beatlemania up close and personal in the UK.
In the Fall of 1962, Ed Sullivan witnesses
the throngs of screaming fans at London’s Heathrow airport when the group
was returning from a concert in Sweden. He was at the airport with British
Prime Minster Edward Heath, when his flight was delayed due to the Beatles
arrival and the swarm of screaming fans that showed up to cheer their return
home. So when Brian Epstein went to New York and pitched Sullivan on the
idea of booking The Beatles on his show, Sullivan saw the opportunity of
introducing the hit UK band to America.
Sullivan initially offered Epstein the
opening slot on the show but Brian wanted his group to headline. A deal
was finally struck for not one but two consecutive appearances from the
Beatles.
With the Sullivan deal in hand and a copy
of the Beatles latest single “I Wanna Hold Your Hand”, Epstein met with
Capitol Records and pitched the group once more. He told them that the
new song was produced “with the American sound in mind” and Capitol reluctantly
took the bait and offered to put out the single on a limited basis a little
over a month before the Sullivan appearances in February of 1964.
In November of 1963, tragedy struck America.
President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Camelot was over and a cloud
of melancholy descended over America. For two months, the country was engulfed
in sadness and loss and they needed something to lift their spirits. It
turned out that what they needed was a pop group from England.
Capitol released “I Wanna Hold Your Hand”
the day after Christmas. On January 18th, 1964 the song entered the Billboard
charts at an impressive number forty-five, despite its limited release
and lack of support from Capitol. When the single raced to number three
on the charts the next week and went to number one the following week,
Capitol Records had to reexamine their assessment of The Beatles viability.
The song wasn’t just hit number one, it exploded
at number one. At that time most hit records were expected to sell around
200,000 copies but the week the Beatles clinched the number one spot on
the Billboard charts the single sold 1.5 million copies in just five days.
Capitol rushed an album into the stores to capitalize on the success of
the single. When “Meet The Beatles” was released it became the fastest
selling LP record in American history. Obviously the executive that said,
“They won’t do anything in this market”, had to eat his words.
The American press, hungry for a happy
story, latched onto the Beatles and they became the biggest story. Beatlemania
exploded in the U.S. with the music and mainstream press giving the new
phenomena their full attention. They were aided by Capitol Records when
the label unleashing an unprecedented marking blitz to announce “The Beatles
were coming”, the floodgates were open and the world would change forever.
We know the rest of the story. The Beatles
touched down in America on February 7, 1964 and made their historic first
Ed Sullivan appearance on Sunday February 9th. America was curious about
the mop headed boys from Liverpool and their harmonious sound. The telecast
became one of the most watched hours in television history and officially
closed the doors on the post Eisenhower era 60s and opened the door to
the 60s that would go down in the history books and change many facets
of American life and culture.
It’s amazing to think that The Beatles
even happened, considering the pigheaded way they were received by the
record companies. Luckily they triumphed in the end and the labels finally
got it--after the fact, as they usually do.
These three stories illustrate a stunning
lack of vision on the part of the music industry. If fate and luck hadn’t
intervened we would never have heard of The Eagles, Jackson Browne, Stevie
Nicks or The Beatles and millions of records would have never been sold,
plus we would be living in quite a different world. You can’t discount
the impact the Beatles had on Western culture. We will most likely never
see anything like it again.
But the thing that gets my stomach churning
when I ponder the stories of these groups and how entirely off the mark
the labels acted is the question of how many new Beatles, The Eagles or
Fleetwood Macs have we missed out on? Groups that could have followed in
their footsteps and made a big impact on music have been out there but
the labels just didn’t “see it”. They turned their backs with “this won’t
sell in this market” and “who would buy that rubbish?” Who indeed.
The saddest part is these stories illustrate
the fatal flaw within the industry that was apparent over 30 years ago.
As the industry has become increasingly trend mongering, it’s a much worse
climate today. So the next Beatles may have been out there, even in your
own town, but they never got the chance to become all that they could be
and the public was robbed of their music; simply because the record executives
got it wrong once again.
It was forty years ago today… and the song
remains the same… still running on stupidity.
Fan Speak:
What do you think?
Fan
Speak:
Posted by psyduck:
Smashing article Keavin!:)
Posted by sandycat:
First of all I realize that real live actual breathing females don't really visit this site much if at all according to the posted names I see here. Let me assure you that not only do we visit sites like this one, we actually listen to (gasp) good old fashioned head banging, punk, alternative, and other anything good music out there well into our 40's. Not just your grandma's music either kiddies. Anyhoo, just wanted to comment on all the crying about how good bands never get promoted and recognized. OK maybe I am a little jaded, but what ever happened to getting off your asses and doing some promoting of your local music scene all by yourselves? Yes boys and girls, local bands do appreciate it when their fans work with them to let other people around the country know they exist. Just think, 1-2 hours on the internet and the ability to read, and you too can contact over 200 people at radio stations, promotional companies and the like who will actually send you an email telling you exactly what they require in order to have you submit a tape, CD, or md3 file of your bands best single. How does my old and wise self actually know these allusive people who do listen to the little people exist? Well, when helping out a friend in a local (gasp) band, I spent a couple o' internet hours and got replies from at least 40 different people and radio stations across the country who were interested enough to have me send them a demo or CD of the bands' music. So.... my point to all of you young un's out there in crybaby land is to quit slobbering in your cheerios and do something! Even the little people can accomplish something if they quit crying and start working. Meow!!
Posted by Monarch:
Crazi-fu(cking-ness. You learn something new every day.
Posted by Rexx:
I don't see that Shayn, reread it and it's not there. But he didn't say anything about a billboard but said something about Billboard, as in the magazine.
Posted by Shayn:
Did no one else pick up on how Keavin mixed up Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckinghams names when he first mentions them, just like that billboard?
Posted by Razjml:
There are problems with the whole "If they were only promoted they'd sell millions!" argument. Music is art, and like so much of it a significant amount of music is only appreciated in retrospect. This was just as true back in the 60s as today. Jimmy Hendrix only had one song crack the US top 40, and he became the legendary giant he is today only after his death. Pink Floyd's brilliant Syd Barrett era work, as well as Barrett's solo stuff was completely ignored in the US and only slightly acknowledged in the UK. The other problem is that the present day ISN'T the climate of the 60s. The mass market doesn't WANT literate, creative, challenging music. Millions of marketing dollars could be put behind current bands that I like and I would still be pretty confident they wouldn't sell at all. That said, everyone check out Sufjan Stevens and the Decemberists and Explosions in the Sky and Chutes Too Narrow by The Shins
Posted by cool article:
these A&R execs are worthless pigs looking for a quick buck! Funny that a secretary made the right decision to pick Jackson Browne's tape and pic out of the trash. It's the secretary and little people who ultimatley make the best critics on what's hot and what is not, these A&R guys wouldn't know a good band if they were sitting on them.
Posted by Dr Fever:
I'm telling ya, if The Emergency (from Morgantown, WV) could get some notice in the world; they would be HUGE. Huge like the Beatles? No. But, they never will get the recognition they deserve..and this piece beautifully illustrates WHY they won't. And, SPIM, you really are a flipping douchebag. EVERYTHING ever greated after 1964 in the world of music owes it's creation to the Beatles. Period. End of list. I will not argue this point. And neither can you because you will be WRONG.
Posted by Rush:
Great article. Too bad this "this band won't sell" practice goes on daily. Not that any of these bands could ever have an impact like the artists in the article, but how many of you had a band in your area that everybody loved and inexplicably never gets a big record deal. In Portland, OR Everclear gets chosen over Heatmiser(including the late Elliott Smith) so Art Alexis can write 20 songs about his dad not being around, while Elliott Smith makes truly great albums in obscurity. Around the St. Louis area The Urge has a rabid following selling out 4 or 5 nights of shows in a row over xmas every year until they broke up last year. Even with the brief popularity of ska years ago, they somehow never broke out of the area due to very little promotion outside of the area. Not that they are necessarily a great asset to music, but who is to say they are worse than say, Blink-182, who enjoy immense popularity. Coming from other countries, especially non-english speaking can be even worse. Even with the so-called "latin invasion" lately, who have we really gotten here? J Lo, she's american. Shakira? Ricky Martin? Enrique Iglesias? They are all pop and all start writing songs in english because apparantly that is the only "latin" music that will sell here. Mana is one of the best selling mexican artists and while many people have heard of them, where do you see ads for groups like this? Where do you hear their music? Buena Vista Social Club had to win multiple Grammy's and most people still haven't heard of them. I could name a long list of great artists that never get heard of here in the US. Is the american public really that unwilling to listen to anything different? I am white, from the north, and spoke very little spanish when I first heard many of my favorite latin artists. Am I really that odd or is the current system just crap?
Posted by SLayer:
about the disney thing. the mousketeer groups are a way to take money from parents of young kids. HOWEVER disneys actual label was the only major label to give actual support and development to its signings that flop their first album and take chances with different music, until they were bought out a few months ago by Sony or Universal or some shi t.
Posted by SPIM:
Me, that was purest sarcasm. I will always dig The Beatles, and so did the guys in my favorite band, especially the dead one.
Posted by tim:
Keavin, Right on the money. I've always maintained that the best musicians never get heard, 'cause the music business thinks all about the business and little about the music. Hence, most successful music acts become successful by adhering to corporate formulae (the aforementined Disney being the most prevelant and despicable) and jumping through the hoops the labels set up. mak is right, it's gonna be sites like anti, in particular, and the Internet in general that will be instrumental in spreading the word about 'marginal' acts and giving control of music to the listener. Tough roads are ahead (litigation, standardization of sound file format etc.) and before it's all over, the suits will probably be running it all anyway, but article like yours can start folks thinking and maybe realizing the opportunity we all have here to let the Mickey Mouse Crowd know that they can take their business elsewhere.
Posted by yep:
awesome man,the labels should read this stuff
Posted by Hobo:
Brilliant stuff Keav!
Posted by DeadSun:
Outstanding, Keavin. I wasn't aware of the circumstances surrounding the way which Fleetwood Mac landed their self-titled debut--- many thanks for the education. Great article--- a good stroll down Rock n'Roll's memory lane. DS
Posted by mak:
It has to be said that it is easier for good bands to get exposure these days because of sites like antimusic. I had no idea who Daniel Johnston was till you reviewed 'Fear Yourself'. Brilliant album.
Posted by Wes Rains:
Man, every decent band that has or ever will be is signed by dumb luck.
Posted by zee:
Amen, wonderful article. There will never be another Beatles. John and George, you are sorely missed.
Posted by ??:
Me did you mean "wouldn't exist"? I agree. You can hate the Beatles all you want but you can't deny that they made a fundemental change to music.
Posted by Me:
Me thinks SPIM missed the point. I can guarantee that his favorite bands would exist without the Beatles. But that's ok. You guys need to do more articles like this. I always learn something new when you do, instead of the usual ranting, which is cool, but it's good to see some analysis too. I'm 22 and have CDs from all three groups, it's timeless unlike the crap out today.
Posted by SPIM:
Well, we should all hold Disney forever in our hearts, because if not for "The Mousekateers" (sp?), the world would never have experienced the greatness of not only Justin Timberlake, but Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears too! Beatles, Fleetmac Wood and Eagles, this is your grandfather's music. What would music be today without Micheal Eisner's impeccable vision?